What if you could describe hardware in plain English and have AI write the Verilog for you? Then simulate it in seconds, synthesize it in the cloud, and deploy to real FPGA hardwareโall from your browser.
FPGA development is stuck in 2005. While software developers use AI assistants to write code and push to production in minutes, FPGA engineers are still hand-coding RTL, waiting 4-8 hours for synthesis, managing 50GB tool installations, and fighting with license servers.
It's absurd. FPGAs are some of the most powerful computing devices on the planetโcapable of processing data at wire speed, accelerating AI inference, and implementing custom hardware logic. Yet the development experience is so painful that many engineers avoid FPGAs entirely.
We're changing that. Today, I'm sharing our vision for AI-powered FPGA development in RespCode: describe what you want, let LLMs generate the HDL, simulate instantly, and deploy to real hardware.
FPGA support is currently in development. This post outlines our vision and architecture. Join the waitlist to get early access when it launches.
The Current State of FPGA Development (It's Painful)
Let's be honest about what FPGA development looks like today:
Xilinx Vivado: 50GB. Intel Quartus: 30GB. Plus device files, IP cores, and simulation libraries. Your laptop's SSD is crying.
Node-locked licenses, floating licenses, license files that expire, MAC address validation, VPN requirements. Entire engineering teams blocked because one license server went down.
Changed one line of Verilog? Time to wait 6 hours for place-and-route. Hope you didn't make a typo.
Development boards start at $500. Production FPGAs can cost $5,000-$50,000 each. Want to test on real hardware? Better have deep pockets.
Constraints files (XDC/SDC), IP integrator, block design, partial reconfiguration, timing closure... The learning curve is a cliff.
"I once waited 12 hours for synthesis only to discover I had the wrong pin assignment. FPGA development is 10% writing code and 90% waiting and debugging tools."
โ Every FPGA engineer, everThe Game Changer: AI-Generated HDL You Can Actually Test
Here's the breakthrough: Large Language Models are surprisingly good at writing hardware description languages. Claude, GPT-4, and DeepSeek can generate synthesizable Verilog and VHDL from natural language descriptionsโbut until now, there was no easy way to verify if the generated code actually works.
Think about it: you can ask ChatGPT to write a FIFO, an SPI controller, or an FFT module. It'll give you Verilog that looks correct. But does it synthesize? Does it meet timing? Does it actually work on hardware? Without spending a weekend setting up tools, you have no idea.
We close the loop. Generate HDL with AI โ Simulate in 5 seconds โ See waveforms โ Fix issues โ Synthesize in the cloud โ Deploy to real FPGA. The entire cycle that used to take days now takes minutes.
How AI + Instant Verification Changes Everything
Imagine this workflow:
This is the unlock. AI can generate HDL, but it makes mistakes. The magic happens when you can instantly verify and iterate. What used to be a multi-day cycle of write โ synthesize โ debug โ repeat becomes a 5-minute conversation with an AI.
Why LLMs Are Better at HDL Than You'd Think
LLMs have ingested millions of lines of open-source Verilog and VHDL. They understand:
- Common patterns โ FIFOs, arbiters, state machines, protocol controllers
- Synthesis semantics โ Blocking vs non-blocking, clock domain crossing, reset strategies
- Best practices โ Synchronous design, registered outputs, proper FSM encoding
- Vendor idioms โ Xilinx primitives, inference patterns for BRAM and DSP
The limitation isn't generationโit's verification. And that's exactly what we're solving.
Generate the same module with Claude, GPT-4, and DeepSeek. Compare resource utilization, timing results, and code quality side-by-side.
Have Claude generate the RTL, GPT-4 write the testbench, and DeepSeek optimize for area. Pipeline your hardware design.
Don't just generate modulesโgenerate comprehensive testbenches with corner cases, protocol checkers, and coverage metrics.
AI learns from synthesis results. If timing fails, it suggests fixes. If resources are high, it offers optimizations.
The RespCode Vision: Cloud-Native FPGA Development
What if FPGA development worked like modern software development? Here's what we're building:
Synthesis is embarrassingly parallelizable. A 6-hour synthesis on a 4-core laptop becomes 30 minutes on a 96-core cloud instance. We eat the cloud costs so you don't have to wait.
Architecture Deep Dive
Here's how the system will work under the hood:
Phase 1: Simulation (Available Now-ish)
We're starting with open-source simulation tools that require no licenses:
- Verilator โ Fastest Verilog simulator, compiles to C++
- Icarus Verilog โ Full Verilog-2005 support
- GHDL โ Complete VHDL simulator
- Yosys โ Open synthesis for visualization
Phase 2: Cloud Synthesis
Vivado synthesis in the cloud, because your laptop shouldn't sound like a jet engine:
Phase 3: AWS F1/F2 Deployment
Real FPGA hardware in the cloud. AWS F1 instances provide Xilinx UltraScale+ VU9P FPGAsโthe same chips used in production data centers.
Real Examples: What AI Can Generate
Let's look at real examples of what our multi-model AI system can generate. These aren't toy examplesโthey're production-ready modules.
Example 1: Natural Language โ Synthesizable Verilog
"Generate a 32-bit wide, 256-deep synchronous FIFO with full/empty flags and an almost_full threshold at 240. Use gray-coded pointers."
// AI-Generated Synchronous FIFO
// Prompt: "Generate a 32-bit wide, 256-deep synchronous FIFO
// with full/empty flags and almost_full threshold"
module sync_fifo #(
parameter DATA_WIDTH = 32,
parameter DEPTH = 256,
parameter ALMOST_FULL_THRESH = 240
)(
input wire clk,
input wire rst_n,
input wire wr_en,
input wire [DATA_WIDTH-1:0] wr_data,
input wire rd_en,
output reg [DATA_WIDTH-1:0] rd_data,
output wire full,
output wire empty,
output wire almost_full
);
localparam ADDR_WIDTH = $clog2(DEPTH);
// Memory and pointers
reg [DATA_WIDTH-1:0] mem [0:DEPTH-1];
reg [ADDR_WIDTH:0] wr_ptr, rd_ptr;
wire [ADDR_WIDTH:0] count = wr_ptr - rd_ptr;
assign full = (count == DEPTH);
assign empty = (count == 0);
assign almost_full = (count >= ALMOST_FULL_THRESH);
always @(posedge clk or negedge rst_n) begin
if (!rst_n) begin
wr_ptr <= 0;
rd_ptr <= 0;
end else begin
if (wr_en && !full) begin
mem[wr_ptr[ADDR_WIDTH-1:0]] <= wr_data;
wr_ptr <= wr_ptr + 1;
end
if (rd_en && !empty) begin
rd_data <= mem[rd_ptr[ADDR_WIDTH-1:0]];
rd_ptr <= rd_ptr + 1;
end
end
end
endmodule
Just like our software modes, you'll be able to use Compete Mode to generate HDL from multiple AI models and compare resource utilization, or Collaborate Mode to have one model generate and another optimize for timing closure.
Example 2: Complex Protocol Controller
"Generate an AXI4-Lite slave interface with 4 32-bit registers: control, status, data_in, data_out. Include proper ready/valid handshaking."
The AI generates a complete AXI4-Lite slave with:
- Proper AWREADY/WREADY/BVALID handshaking
- ARREADY/RVALID read channel
- Address decoding for 4 registers
- BRESP/RRESP error handling
Then you simulate it instantly to verify the handshaking is correctโno waiting for synthesis.
Example 3: DSP Pipeline
"Generate a pipelined 8-tap FIR filter with 16-bit signed coefficients and 16-bit signed input. Optimize for Xilinx DSP48 inference."
The AI understands DSP48 inference patterns and generates code that Vivado will correctly map to dedicated DSP slicesโnot fabric LUTs.
Target Hardware & Pricing Model
We're planning support for multiple FPGA targets:
| Target | FPGA | Use Case | Est. Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| ๐ Simulation Only | Verilator / Icarus | Learning, basic verification | Free |
| ๐ง iCE40 | Lattice iCE40 UP5K | Small designs, open toolchain | ~$0.01/run |
| โก ECP5 | Lattice ECP5 | Medium designs, open toolchain | ~$0.05/run |
| ๐ฅ Artix-7 | Xilinx Artix-7 | Production designs | ~$0.50/synth |
| ๐ AWS F1/F2 | Xilinx UltraScale+ VU9P | High-performance, production | ~$5/hour runtime |
Use Cases: Who Needs Cloud FPGA Development?
Teach digital design without managing lab hardware. Students get real FPGA experience from any laptop.
Prototype FPGA accelerators without $100K in hardware and tools. Validate ideas before committing to silicon.
Deploy custom inference accelerators. Test quantized models on real FPGA fabric before production.
DSP algorithm development with real-time verification. Filters, FFTs, and custom datapaths.
Hardware security modules, cryptographic accelerators, side-channel testing on real silicon.
Parallel synthesis jobs across distributed teams. No license server bottlenecks.
What We're Building First
Our FPGA roadmap is aggressive but focused:
Q1 2026: Simulation
- Verilator integration for fast Verilog simulation
- GHDL for VHDL support
- Browser-based waveform viewer (VCD/FST)
- AI-assisted HDL generation in all modes
Q2 2026: Open Toolchain
- Yosys synthesis for visualization
- iCE40 bitstream generation (Project IceStorm)
- ECP5 support (Project Trellis)
- Remote programming to dev boards
Q3 2026: Commercial Toolchains
- Xilinx Vivado in cloud (licensed)
- Intel Quartus support
- Parallel synthesis on high-core instances
- Synthesis caching for incremental builds
Q4 2026: AWS F1/F2 Integration
- Full AWS F1/F2 deployment pipeline
- AFI creation and management
- Shared FPGA instance pool
- Real-time hardware debugging
Technical Challenges (We're Solving)
This isn't easy. Here's what we're tackling:
Incremental synthesis is hard. We're building smart caching that reuses unchanged modules across builds.
F1/F2 instances are expensive ($1.65/hr). We're building instance pooling and time-sharing to minimize costs.
Vivado licenses are node-locked nightmares. We're working with Xilinx on cloud-friendly licensing.
VCD files can be gigabytes. We're building progressive loading and server-side rendering for smooth viewing.
The Competition Comparison
How does this compare to existing solutions?
| Feature | RespCode FPGA | Local Vivado | EDA Playground |
|---|---|---|---|
| No install required | โ | โ 50GB | โ |
| AI code generation | โ 4 models | โ | โ |
| Real FPGA hardware | โ AWS F1/F2 | โ Requires board | โ |
| Cloud synthesis | โ 96 cores | โ Local only | โ |
| Team collaboration | โ | โ | โ Limited |
| Commercial targets | โ UltraScale+ | โ | โ |
Want Early Access to FPGA Development?
We're building the future of hardware development. Join the waitlist to be first in line when FPGA support launches.
Join Waitlist โ Read About ARM Support โConclusion: The Future is Programmable
FPGAs are incredible technology held back by terrible tooling. We're fixing that.
Imagine a world where:
- A student learns digital design without a $500 dev board
- A startup prototypes an AI accelerator in an afternoon
- An engineer iterates on timing closure in minutes, not hours
- A team collaborates on HDL like they do on software
That's the world we're building. Cloud-native FPGA development, powered by AI, accessible to everyone.
"Hardware is hard. But it doesn't have to be this hard. The tools should get out of your way and let you build."
โ The RespCode TeamStay tuned. We'll share updates as we hit milestones. In the meantime, check out our existing multi-architecture support for ARM and RISC-Vโit's live today.